Coronal vertical fracture of vertebral body following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: risk factor analysis in consecutive case series.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of coronal vertical vertebral body fracture (CV-VBF) during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Clinical data, including age, sex, body mass index, and bone mineral density, were reviewed. Radiological assessments, such as facet joint arthrosis, intervertebral disc motion, index disc height, and cage profiles, were conducted. Posterior instrumentation was performed using either a single or staged procedure after LLIF. Demographic and surgical data were compared between patients with and without VBF. RESULTS: Out of 273 patients (552 levels), 7 (2.6%) experienced CV-VBF. Among the 552 levels, VBF occured in 7 levels (1.3%). All VBF cases developed intraoperatively during LLIF, with no instances caused by cage subsidence during the follow-up period. Sagittal motion in segments adjacent to VBF was smaller than in others (4.6° ± 2.6° versus 6.5° ± 3.9°, P = 0.031). The average grade of facet arthrosis was 2.5 ± 0.7, indicating severe facet arthrosis. All fractures developed due to oblique placement of a trial or cage into the index disc space, leading to a nutcracker effect. These factors were not related to bone quality. CONCLUSIONS: CV-VBF after LLIF occurred in 2.6% of patients, accounting for 1.3% of all LLIF levels. A potential risk factor for VBF involves the nutcracker-impinging effect due to the oblique placement of a cage. Thorough preoperative evaluations and surgical procedures are needed to avoid VBF when considering LLIF in patients with less mobile spine.

Characteristics and standards of severe sagittal imbalance in adult patients with spinal deformities: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of "severe" dynamic sagittal imbalance (DSI) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and establish criteria for them. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with ASD presenting four cardinal signs of lumbar degenerative kyphosis. All patients underwent deformity corrective surgery and were divided into three groups according to the diagnostic criteria based on the Oswestry disability index and dynamic features (△Timewalk: time until C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] reaches ≥ 20 cm after the start of walking) of sagittal imbalance. The paravertebral back muscles were analyzed and compared using T2-weighted axial imaging. We performed a statistically time-dependent spinopelvic sagittal parameter analysis of full standing lateral lumbar radiographs. Lumbar flexibility was analyzed using dynamic lateral lumbar radiography. RESULTS: The patients were classified into the mild (△Timewalk ≥ 180 s, 35 patients), moderate (180 s > △Timewalk ≥ 30 s, 38 patients), and severe (△Timewalk < 30 s, 29 patients) groups. The back muscles in the severe group exhibited a significantly higher signal intensity (533.4 ± 237.5, p < 0.05) and larger area of fat infiltration (35.2 ± 5.4, p < 0.05) than those in the mild (223.8 ± 67.6/22.9 ± 11.9) and moderate groups (294.4 ± 214.7/21.6 ± 10.6). The analysis of lumbar flexibility revealed significantly lower values in the severe group (5.8° ± 2.5°, p < 0.05) than in the mild and moderate groups (14.2° ± 12.4° and 11.4° ± 8.7°, respectively). The severe group had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (LL, 25.1° ± 22.7°, p < 0.05) and Pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL, 81.5° ± 26.6°, p < 0.001) than those of the mild (8.2° ± 16.3°/58.7° ± 18.8°) and moderate (14.3° ± 28.6°/66.8° ± 13.4°) groups. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, PI-LL was statistically significant, with an area under the curve of 0.810 (95% confidence interval) when the baseline was set at 75.3°. The severe group had more postoperative complications than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the following criteria for severe DSI: C7SVA > 20 cm within 30 s of walking or standing, a rigid lumbar curve < 10° on dynamic lateral radiographs, and a PI-LL mismatch > 75.3°.

Anterior Column Realignment Through Open Pre-posterior Release-Anterior-Posterior Fusion Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive-Anterior-Posterior Fusion for Dynamic Sagittal Imbalance of the Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes after anterior column realignment (ACR) through pre-posterior release-anterior-posterior surgery (PAP) and minimally invasive surgery -lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) using hybrid anterior-posterior surgery (AP). METHODS: A total of 91 patients who underwent ACR with long fusions from T10 vertebra to the sacropelvis with a follow-up period of at least 2 years after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity were included and divided into two groups by surgical method: AP and PAP. AP was performed in 26 and PAP in 65 patients. Clinical outcomes and radiological parameters were investigated and compared. A further comparison was conducted after propensity score matching between the groups. RESULTS: The more increase of LL and decrease of PI-LL mismatch were observed in the PAP group than in the AP group postoperatively. After propensity score matching, total operation time and intraoperative bleeding were greater, and intensive care unit care and rod fracture were more frequent in the PAP group than in the AP group with statistical significance. Reoperation rate was higher in PAP (29.2%) than in AP (16.7%) without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: PAP provides a more powerful correction for severe sagittal malalignment than AP procedures. AP results in less intraoperative bleeding, operation time, and postoperative complications. Therefore, this study does not suggest that one treatment is superior to the other. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Autophagy in an extruded disc compared to the remaining disc after lumbar disc herniation in the same patient.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate autophagy in an extruded disc and to compare this activity with the activity in the remaining disc after lumbar disc herniation in the same patient. METHODS: In total, 12 patients (females 4, males 8) with the extruded type of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) were surgically treated. Their mean age was 54.3 ± 15.8 years (range: 29 ~ 78 years). The mean interval from the occurrence of symptoms to the operation was 9.8 ± 9.4 weeks (range: 2 ~ 24 weeks). The extruded discs were excised, and the remaining disc material removed, to prevent recurrence of herniation. Immediately after specimen collection, all tissues were stored at -70 °C prior to analysis. Autophagy was assessed immunohistochemically and via Western blotting for Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, Atg12L1, and Beclin-1. And the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis was investigated by correlation analysis of caspase-3 with autophagy proteins. RESULTS: The expression levels of autophagic markers were significantly increased in the extruded discs compared to the remaining discs within the same patients. The mean expression levels of Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, and Beclin-1 in extruded discs were statistically significantly higher than those in the remaining discs (P < 0.01, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The autophagic pathway was more active in extruded disc material than in remaining disc material within the same patient. This may explain spontaneous resorption of the extruded disc after LDH.

Risk factors for mechanical complications after fusion extension surgery for lumbar adjacent segment disease.

PURPOSE: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common complication in fusion surgery. In the event of solid segmental fusion, previous implants can be removed or preserved during fusion extension for ASD. To compare the surgical outcomes of patients with and without implants and analyzes the risk factors for postoperative mechanical complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent fusion extension for lumbar ASD from 2011 to 2019 with a minimum 2 year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes and surgical complications were compared between groups with implants preserved and removed. Risk factors for mechanical complications, including clinical, surgical, and radiographic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 6.9 years) were included. The mean numbers of initial and extended fused segments were 2.8 ± 0.7 and 2.7 ± 0.7, respectively. Previous implants were removed in 43 patients (R group) and preserved in 26 patients (P group). Both groups showed an improvement in clinical outcomes without between-group differences. The operation time was significantly longer in R group (260 vs 207 min, p < 0.001). Mechanical complications occurred in 13 patients (12 in R group and 1 in P group) and reoperation was needed in 3 patients (R group). Implant removal, index fusion surgery including L5-S1, and postoperative sagittal malalignment were risk factors for mechanical complications. CONCLUSION: Implant removal was a risk factor for mechanical complications. Index fusion surgery including L5-S1 and postoperative sagittal malalignment were also risk factors for mechanical complications.

Application of Escherichia coli-Derived Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 to Unstable Spinal Fractures.

(1) Background: Recently, Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (E. coli-derived rhBMP-2) has been increasingly applied to different types of spinal surgeries and reported to achieve successful fusion. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of rhBMP-2 in patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusions for unstable spinal fractures. (2) Methods: This study included ten consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery using E. coli-derived rhBMP-2 with more than one year of follow-up. Radiologic outcomes were compared, including the average fracture healing period, local kyphosis correction, and clinical outcomes between preoperative and the last follow-up. (3) Results: The average time of radiographic union was 99.9 ± 45.4 (62-192) days, with an average use of 5.2 ± 3.9 months of anabolic agents. Radiologic parameters such as anterior vertebral height and vertebral wedge angle were significantly corrected postoperatively and at the last follow-up. Clinical outcomes other than leg pain were significantly improved after the surgery. In addition, four patients with preoperative neurologic deficits showed improved neurologic status. (4) Conclusions: Combined with the anabolic agents, applying E. coli-derived rhBMP-2 to the fractured vertebral body could be an effective surgical treatment for unstable spinal fractures. Further trials are needed to validate this result.

Junctional Failures at Both Ends After Long Fusion Arthrodesis Stopping at L5: Incidences and Risk Factors.

OBJECTIVE: Junctional failures after long fusion stopping at L5 can present at both proximal and distal ends. The purpose of this study was to investigate incidences and risk factors of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and distal junctional failure (DJF) after long lumbar instrumented fusion stopping at L5 for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Sixty-three patients who underwent long fusion surgery stopping at L5 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were reviewed retrospectively. PJF and DJF were defined as newly developed back pain and/or radiculopathy with corresponding radiographic failures. The incidence and risk factors of each junctional failure were analyzed using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Twelve men and 51 women were included in our study. Their mean age was 68.5 ± 7.0 years and the mean follow-up period was 84.5 ± 45.3 months. PJF and DJF occurred in 17 (27%) and 16 patients (25.4%), respectively. PJF and DJF developed at median durations of 32.1 months and 13.3 months, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two. Three patients presented with both PJF and DJF. Risk factors for PJF included lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (hazard ratio, 0.570, 1.055, and 1.040, respectively). For DJF, higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 1.010). CONCLUSIONS: After long fusion surgery stopping at L5, PJF and DJF occurred at similar rates. Lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative SVA were risk factors for PJF. Higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor for DJF.

When Should Spinal Surgery Be Considered for Spinal Metastasis from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?-Propensity Score Matched Study between Surgery with Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone.

(1) Background: Although metastatic spine disease is increasing, the debate on therapeutic modality remains due to the heterogeneity of tumors and patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacies of surgery and risk factors for patients' survival from potentially unstable spinal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer; (2) Methods: Twenty-two patients undergoing surgery and radiotherapy (group I) were compared with 22 patients undergoing radiotherapy alone (group II) using propensity score matching in a 1-to-1 format. Clinical outcomes included the performance status and ambulatory status. In addition, independent risk factors for patients' survival were evaluated, including the molecular targeted therapy for mutations; (3) Results: deterioration in neurologic status was only observed in group II compared to group I (22.7% vs. 0%, p-value = 0.018). In addition, five patients in the surgery group showed improved Frankel grades. Regarding the patients' survival, a smoking history of more than ten pack-years (hazard ratio (HR) = 12.18), worse performance status (HR = 6.86), and absence of mutations (HR = 3.39) were the independent risk factors; (4) Conclusions: Spinal surgery with radiotherapy could have advantages for improving the neurologic status including ambulation for potentially unstable spine due to metastasis. Thus, surgery should be considered for patients with a longer life expectancy resulting from better performance status and use of the targeted therapy.

The neuro-protective role of telomerase via TERT/TERF-2 in the acute phase of spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To investigate the interaction of telomerase activity and telomere length on neuro-protection or neuro-degeneration effects after spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A contusive SCI model was developed using 56 Sprague-Dawley rats. Seven rats were allocated into acute injury phase groups (1, 3, 8, 24, and 48 h), and sub-acute and chronic injury phase groups (1, 2, and 4 weeks). Telomerase activity was assessed by telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and telomeric repeat binding factor-2 (TERF-2). Differentiation of activated neural stem cells was investigated by co-expression of neuronal/glial cell markers. Apoptosis expression was also investigated by caspase-3, 8, and 9 using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling staining. Immunofluorescence staining and western blotting were performed for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Expression of TERT increased gradually until 24 h post-injury, and was decreased following SCI (P < 0.05). TERF-2 also was increased following SCI until 24 h post-injury and then decreased with time (P < 0.05). Co-localization of TERT and TERF-2 was higher at 24 h post-injury. High expression of TERT was seen in neurons (Neu N Ab), however, expression of TERT was relatively lower in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Apoptosis analysis showed persistent high expression of caspases-3, -9, and -8 during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Increased TERT and TERF-2 activity were noted 24 h post-injury in the acute phase of SCI with TERF-2 maintaining telomeric-repeat length. Our results suggest that increased activity of telomere maintenance may be related to neuro-protective mechanisms against subsequent apoptosis resulting from DNA damage after acute SCI.

Reoperation depending on time period following pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate time-dependent rates and indications of unplanned reoperation and to evaluate the most common indication depending on the time interval after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A total of 321 consecutive patients with AS (284 men; mean age 43.8 years) with thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent PSO were included. Patients who underwent reoperation after the index surgery were divided according to the duration of the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (15.9%) underwent unplanned reoperations. The reoperation groups had greater preoperative and postoperative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and less lordotic postoperative osteotomy angle (-4.3° ± 18.6° vs -15.0° ± 13.7°, p < 0.001). The perioperative change in SVA was not significantly different between groups (-10.0 ± 7.1 cm vs -10.0 ± 5.1 cm, p = 0.970), while that in the osteotomy angle was significantly different (-22.4° ± 21.3° vs -30.0° ± 11.5°, p = 0.014). Most reoperations (45.1%; 23/51) were performed within 2 weeks of the initial operation. Within 2 weeks, the most common cause of reoperation was neurological deficit in 10 patients, with a cumulative reoperation rate of 3.2%. After 3 years, the most common complications were mechanical complications in 8 patients, accounting for 15.7% (8/51) of patients. Overall, the most common indications for reoperation were mechanical complications (17 patients; 5.3%), followed by neurological deficits (12 patients; 3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: PSO may be the most effective surgical procedure for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with AS. However, 51 patients (15.9%) required an unplanned reoperation.

Effects of bone cement augmentation for uppermost instrumented vertebra on adjacent disc segment degeneration in lumbar fusions.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the long-term effects of bone cement-augmented instrumentation in multilevel lumbar fusions in a retrospective cohort study. The use of cement-augmented screws is one of the techniques used to reduce early mechanical failure in treating multilevel lumbar fusion, especially in the elderly. However, little information is available regarding the long-term effects. METHODS: A total of 51 patients who had undergone ≥3 levels of lumbar fusion were divided into two groups according to the use of bone cement-augmented screw fixation involving the upper instrumented vertebra: 22 patients in the cement-augmented group (group I) and 29 patients in the non-cement-augmented group (group II). Analysis of radiographic adjacent disc segment degeneration (ASD) revealed patients with lumbosacral fusion with a similar degree of osteoporosis. Radiologic ASD was defined as progression of >2 UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) grades at 2 years postoperatively. Other sagittal parameters and the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging Pfirrmann grades at the adjacent levels, possibly related to ASD, were also analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were present in the preoperative demographic and radiographic parameters between the 2 groups. However, the postoperative kyphotic changes at 3 months were greater for the non-cement-augmented group. In terms of the long-term effects, the incidence of radiologic ASD (group I, n = 20 [95.2%]; vs group II, n = 15 [53.6%]) was significantly higher in the cement-augmented group. Logistic regression analysis of radiologic ASD, including other clinical and radiologic parameters, postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (odds ratio, 5.201; 95% confidence interval, 1.123-24.090; P = 0.035), and cement augmentation (odds ratio, 20.193; 95% confidence interval, 2.195-185.729; P = 0.008) showed a significant correlation with the development of radiologic ASD at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although bone cement-augmented screw implantation can prevent kyphotic deformation at the proximal junction of upper instrumented vertebra in the early postoperative stages of multilevel lumbar fusion, a careful selection of patients is required because of possibly accelerated degeneration of adjacent segments.

Simple and Reliable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter to Predict Postoperative Ambulatory Function in Patients With Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable imaging parameter to predict postoperative ambulatory status in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). METHODS: Sixty-three patients with MESCC underwent spine surgery because of neurologic deficits were included. On preoperative axial MRI, the cord compression ratio was analyzed for postoperative ambulatory status. The relationship between other imaging features, such as fracture of the affected vertebra and increased T2 signal intensity of the spinal cord at the compression level, and the postoperative ambulatory status were also analyzed. RESULTS: Cord compression ratio and increased T2 signal change of the spinal cord were significantly different between the postoperative ambulatory group and the non-ambulatory group. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value was 0.84. In the multivariate regression analysis, only a cord compression ratio of more than 0.84 was significantly associated with postoperative ambulatory status (odds ratio = 10.80; 95% confidence interval = 2.79-41.86; P = .001). Interobserver/intraobserver agreements were strong for the cord compression ratio, however those agreements were weak for increased T2 signal intensity. CONCLUSIONS: On preoperative MRI, the cord compression ratio may predict postoperative ambulatory status in patients with MESCC. The measurement of this imaging parameter was simple and reliable. This imaging predictor may be helpful for both clinicians and patients.

Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Osteobiologics for Lumbar Fusion.

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is an excellent treatment option for a number of lumbar diseases. LIF can be performed through posterior, transforaminal, anterior, and lateral or oblique approaches. Each technique has its own pearls and pitfalls. Through LIF, segmental stabilization, neural decompression, and deformity correction can be achieved. Minimally invasive surgery has recently gained popularity and each LIF procedure can be performed using minimally invasive techniques to reduce surgery-related complications and improve early postoperative recovery. Despite advances in surgical technology, surgery-related complications after LIF, such as pseudoarthrosis, have not yet been overcome. Although autogenous iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard for spinal fusion, other bone substitutes are available to enhance fusion rate and reduce complications associated with bone harvest. This article reviews the surgical procedures and characteristics of each LIF and the osteobiologics utilized in LIF based on the available evidence.

Surgical sequence in anterior column realignment with posterior osteotomy is important for degree of adult spinal deformity correction: advantages and indications for posterior to anterior sequence.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that posterior osteotomy prior to ACR (Anterior column realignment) through P-A-P surgical sequence would permit a greater correction for deformity corrective surgery than the traditional A-P sequence without posterior osteotomy. This study aimed to determine the impact of the P-A-P sequence on the restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) compared to the A-P sequence in deformity corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and to identify the characteristics of patients who require this sequence.  METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, 260 ASD patients who had undergone combined corrective surgery were reviewed retrospectively. This study included 178 patients who underwent posterior osteotomy before the ACR (P-A group) and 82 patients who underwent the A-P sequence (A-P group). Sagittal spinopelvic parameters were determined from pre- and postoperative whole-spine radiographs and compared between the groups. To find better indications for the P-A-P sequence, we conducted additional analysis on postoperative outcomes of patients in the A-P group.  RESULTS: The P-A group showed a significantly higher change in LL (53.7° vs. 44.3°, p < 0.001), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA: 197.4 mm vs. 146.1 mm, p = 0.021), segmental lordosis (SL) L2/3 (16.2° vs. 14.4°, p = 0.043), SL L3/4 (16.2° vs. 13.8°, p = 0.004), and SL L4/5 (15.1° vs. 11.3°, p = 0.001) compared to the A-P group. At the final follow-up, pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL mismatch (PI - LL mismatch) was significantly higher in the A-P group (13.4° vs. 2.9°, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.151; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.414-3.272; p < 0.001), severe osteoporosis (OR = 2.824; 95% CI, 1.481-5.381; p = 0.002), rigid lumbar curve with dynamic changes in LL < 10° (OR = 5.150; 95% CI, 2.296-11.548; p < 0.001), and severe facet joint osteoarthritis (OR = 4.513; 95% CI, 1.958-10.402; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PI - LL mismatch ≥ 10° after A-P surgery. CONCLUSION: P-A-P sequence for deformity corrective surgery in ASD offers greater LL correction than the A-P sequence. Indications for the procedure include patients aged ≥ 75 years, severe osteoporosis, rigid lumbar curve with dynamic change in LL < 10°, or more than four facet joints of Pathria grade 3 in the lumbar region.

Rod Fracture After Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Using a Side-Tightening Pedicle Screw System in Consecutive Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of rod fractures (RFs) after a single-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) using a side-tightening (ST) pedicle screw system. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a single-level lumbar PSO for the degenerative sagittal imbalance at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using an ST pedicle screw system. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for RF. RESULTS: Seven (12.3%) patients showed RF after PSO. Four patients had bilateral RFs, and 3 patients had unilateral RFs. The location of the RF was at the PSO level in 6 of 7 patients. The ratio of adjacent interbody fusion was significantly different between the group with RF and the group without RF (16.7% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.004). The preoperative segmental angle at the PSO vertebra (-6.1° ± 5.5° vs. -1.7° ± 4.6°, P = 0.049) and postsurgical change in lumbar lordosis (48.4° ± 8.8° vs. 37.8° ± 11.9°, P = 0.033) were significantly different between the 2 groups. Risk factor analysis using stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the absence of an adjacent interbody cage (odds ratio = 0.011, 95% confidence interval = 0.000-0.390, P = 0.013) was a significant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RF after a single-level lumbar PSO using the ST pedicle screw system was 12.3% in our cohort. The absence of an adjacent interbody cage was a significant risk factor for RF.

Unstable Pathologic Vertebral Fractures in Multiple Myeloma : Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study between Reconstructive Surgery with Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Radiotherapy Alone.

OBJECTIVE: Although radiotherapy (RT) is recommended for multiple myeloma (MM) involving spine, the treatment of choice between reconstructive surgery with RT and RT alone for pathologic vertebral fractures (PVFs) associated with structural instability or neurologic compromises remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacies of reconstructive surgery with adjuvant RT for treatment of MM with PVFs by comparing with matched cohorts treated with RT alone. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent reconstructive surgery followed by RT between 2008 and 2015 in a single institution, for management of PVFs associated with structural instability of the spine and/or neurologic compromises (group I). Twentyeight patients were treated with RT alone (group II) after propensity score matching in a 1-to-1 format based on instability of the spine, as well as age and performance. Clinical outcomes including the overall survival rates, duration of independent ambulation, neurological status, and numeric rating scale (NRS) for back pain were compared. RESULTS: Clinical and radiological features before treatment were similar in both groups. The median survival period was similar between the two groups. However, the mean duration of independent ambulation was significantly longer in group I (88.8 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66.0-111.5) than in group II (39.4 months; 95% CI, 25.2-53.6) (log rank test; p=0.022). Deterioration of Frankel grade (21.4% vs. 60.7%, p=0.024) and NRS for back pain (2.7±2.2 vs. 5.0±2.7, p=0.000) at the last follow-up were higher in the group II. Treatment-related complications were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with unstable PVFs due to MM, reconstructive surgery may yield superior clinical outcomes compared with RT alone in maintaining independent ambulation and neurological status, as well as pain control despite similar median survival and complications.

Relationship between Sagittal Alignment and Anterior Bony Resorption of Cervical Vertebral Body in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study. PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of anterior resorption of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and its relationship with sagittal alignment. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: This study believes that no published reports exist regarding the relationship between anterior resorption and spinopelvic alignment. METHODS: This retrospective study included 238 patients with AS who underwent surgical correction for thoracolumbar kyphosis. Of these, 80 patients with complete subaxial ankylosis were selected and divided into two groups: groups 1 (consisting of 28 patients with anterior bony resorption) and 2 (consisting of 52 patients without anterior resorption). Cervical sagittal parameters were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average lateral diameter measured in patients with C5 anterior resorption was 84.2%±7.8% (62.4%-96.8%). Cervical lordosis was 8.7°±13.4° and 10.9°±11.5° in groups 1 and 2 (p=0.556), respectively. No significant differences were noted between the two groups on spinopelvic alignment in the T1 slope (52.2°±11.1° and 53.3°±9.9° in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.742), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 6.2±1.7 cm and 6.2±1.8 cm in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.978), C7 SVA (14.3±4.9 cm and 14.6±6.2 cm in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.823), or T1 pelvic angle (27.1°±8.9° and 31.6°±11.2° in groups 1 and 2, respectively; p=0.382). Correlation analyses were significant between the extent of anterior resorption and sagittal parameters, C2-C7 lordosis (R2=-0.428, p=0.021), and T1-T4 kyphosis (R2=-0.375, p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior bony resorption could develop by stress concentration. However, the development was not related to the sagittal alignment. The particular segments involved in developing anterior resorption varied, possibly because of their dependence on the preceding pattern of ankylosis.

Are the Choice of Frame and Intraoperative Patient Positioning Associated With Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes in Long-instrumented Lumbar Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of patient positioning during spinal surgery evaluated intraoperative or immediate postoperative outcomes after short-instrumented lumbar fusion. However, patient positioning during long-instrumented fusion for an adult spinal deformity (ASD) might be associated with differences in intraoperative parameters such as blood loss and longer-term outcomes such as spine alignment, and comparing types of surgical tables in the context of these larger procedures and evaluating longer-term outcome scores seem important. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do blood loss and the number of transfusions differ between patients who underwent multi-level spinal fusion with a Wilson frame and those with a four-poster frame? (2) Does restoration of lumbar lordosis and the sagittal vertical axis differ between patients who underwent surgery with the use of one frame or the other? (3) Do clinical outcomes as determined by Numeric Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores differ between the two groups of patients? (4) Are there differences in postoperative complications between the two groups? METHODS: Among 651 patients undergoing thoracolumbar instrumented fusion between 2015 and 2018, 129 patients treated with more than four levels of initial fusion for an ASD were identified. A total of 48% (62 of 129) were eligible; 44% (57 of 129) were excluded because of a history of fusion, three-column osteotomy, or surgical indications other than degenerative deformity, and another 8% (10 of 129) were lost before the minimum 2-year follow-up period. Before January 2017, one surgeon in this study used only a Wilson frame; starting in January 2017, the same surgeon consistently used a four-poster frame. Forty patients had spinal fusion using the Wilson frame; 85% (34 of 40) of these had follow-up at least 2 years postoperatively (mean 44 ± 13 months). Thirty-two patients underwent surgery using the four-poster frame; 88% (28 of 32) of these were available for follow-up at least 2 years later (mean 34 ± 6 months). The groups did not differ in terms of age, gender, BMI, type of deformity, or number of fused levels. Surgical parameters such as blood loss and the total amount of blood transfused were compared between the two groups. Estimated blood loss was measured by the amount of suction drainage and the amount of blood that soaked gauze. The decision to transfuse blood was based on intraoperative hemoglobin values, a protocol that was applied equally to both groups. Radiologic outcomes including sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes such as the Numerical Rating Scale score for back pain (range 0-10; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 2.9) and leg pain (range 0-10; MCID 2.9) as well as the Oswestry Disability Index score (range 0-100; MCID 15.4) were also assessed through a longitudinally maintained database by two spine surgeons who participated in this study. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare selected radiologic outcomes between the two groups over time. RESULTS: Blood loss and the total amount of transfused blood were greater in the Wilson frame group than in the four-poster frame group (2019 ± 1213 mL versus 1171 ± 875 mL; mean difference 848 [95% CI 297 to 1399]; p = 0.003 for blood loss; 1706 ± 1003 mL versus 911 ± 651 mL; mean difference 795 [95% CI 353 to 1237]; p = 0.001 for transfusion). Lumbar lordosis and the sagittal vertical axis were less restored in the Wilson frame group than in the four-poster frame group (7° ± 10° versus 18° ± 14°; mean difference -11° [95% -17° to -5°]; p < 0.001 for lumbar lordosis; -22 ± 31 mm versus -43 ± 27 mm; mean difference 21 [95% CI 5 to 36]; p = 0.009 for the sagittal vertical axis). Such differences persisted at 2 years of follow-up. The proportion of patients with the desired correction was also greater in the four-poster frame group than in the Wilson frame group immediately postoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up (50% versus 21%, respectively; odds ratio 3.9 [95% CI 1.3 to 11.7]; p = 0.02; 43% versus 12%, respectively; odds ratio 5.6 [95% CI 1.6 to 20.3]; p = 0.005). We found no clinically important differences in postoperative patient-reported outcomes including Numeric Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, and there were no differences in postoperative complications at 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The ideal patient position during surgery for an ASD should decrease intra-abdominal pressure and induce lordosis as the abdomen hangs freely and hip flexion is decreased. The four-poster frame appears advantageous for long-segment fusions for spinal deformities. Future studies are needed to extend our analyses to different types of spinal deformities and validate radiologic and clinical outcomes with follow-up for more than 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL: III, therapeutic study.

Improvements in lower-extremity patient-reported outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, new patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the spine were designed to overcome the limitations of previous spinal PROMs and to consider the whole spine as a single kinetic functional unit. Owing to the significance of spine-hip-knee and global body balance, the spine and lower extremities cannot be considered separately. However, no reports have evaluated lower-extremity functional outcome using PROMs after lumbar spine surgery. The authors aimed to elucidate changes in hip and knee PROMs after lumbar interbody fusion and to evaluate the sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters that were most strongly correlated with lower-extremity PROMs. METHODS: In 2018, the authors consecutively evaluated patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery with at most three levels. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative clinical and radiographic data were assessed. Spinal functional outcomes were measured with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) questionnaire. Lower-extremity functional outcomes were evaluated with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between spinal and lower-extremity PROMs and spinopelvic radiographic parameters. RESULTS: The authors enrolled 67 patients, with a mean age of 66.4 years. The average number of surgical levels was 1.7. All assessed PROMs improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.001 for ODI, p < 0.001 for VAS, p = 0.017 for SRS-22r, p = 0.042 for HHS, and p = 0.033 for WOMAC). Spinopelvic parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), C7 sagittal vertical axis, and sagittal radiographic parameters of hip and knee, significantly improved after surgery. On linear regression analysis, HHS and WOMAC correlated with LL and PT, respectively (ß = 0.554 and p = 0.043 for correlation of HHS with LL; ß = 1.573 and p = 0.021 for correlation of WOMAC with PT). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that lumbar fusion surgery may induce postoperative improvements in lower-extremity functional and radiological outcomes. However, among radiographic parameters, changes in LL and PT were the most strongly associated with lower-extremity PROMs.

Surgical correction for adult spinal deformity increases acetabular lateral coverage of femoral heads.

BACKGROUND: Studies explaining the relationship between hip and spine reported that spinal corrective surgery affected acetabular orientation and changes in pelvic tilt were capable of influencing radiographic measures of acetabular coverage. This study aimed to assess the change in coronal parameters for acetabular coverage as a result of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction and to analyze the relationship between the postoperative changes in sagittal spinopelvic parameters and coronal acetabular coverage parameters. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients who had undergone multilevel spinal surgical correction were enrolled and evaluated. Coronal acetabular coverage parameters included Tönnis angle (TA), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), and the angle of Sharp (SA). All radiographic parameters were evaluated at the preoperative and the postoperative 1 year. Paired t test was used to determine whether there were significant changes between the time points. Bivariate correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between the postoperative changes of spinal alignment and acetabular orientation. RESULTS: The surgical correction resulted in significant decrease of TA, increase of LCEA and SA, respectively (p < 0.001). The changes in pelvic tilt (PT) demonstrated weak correlation on TA (ß = 0.117, p < 0.001 for right; ß = 0.111, p < 0.001 for left). CONCLUSIONS: Although the surgical correction of ASD significantly changed PT resulting in increased acetabular lateral coverage parameters, the correlation between the changes of PT following sagittal correction of ASD and acetabular coverage parameters was low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of our institution (approval number: KHNMC-2020-10-010).